Spending big doesn’t get you the chain of office


city_scope_logo-cmykThe final numbers have been submitted and it’s a bitter lesson for mayoral candidate Mark Cosens, who found you can’t spend your way to the top.
March 27 was the deadline for candidates to file campaign expenses for the 2014 municipal vote and all 22 individuals met that target.
Cosens claimed $15,244.94 in expenses, which was well beyond double the amount logged by Mayor Heather Jackson at $5,883.59.
Cliff Barwick, who filed months ago, spent just over $4,000.

The upper limit in the mayoral race was $30,855.45, with a $750 cap for each individual, corporation or union.
Ald. Mark CosensFile photoCosens benefitted from $15,483,26 in campaign income with some prominent backers including Don and Lynda Cosens at $750 each; Bob McCaig ($750); Suzanne vanBommel ($750); Steve Peters ($750); Don Begg ($750); Marian Jackson ($750); Dr. Robert Farley ($750); and Jeff Kohler ($250).
At the corporate level, Suzanne vanBommel Ent. chipped in $750; Fifteen St. Catherine St. Inc — architect Ward Houghton — $500; Houghton and Houghton ($250); Maxill Inc. ($500); Peter Mancini Prof. Corp. ($500); and Windon Farm — Ian Begg — ($750).
VanBommel was busy on the trail — over and above acting as campaign manager — and Patrick Van Bommel chipped in $500 in kind for lumber and hardware for election signs through Har Mar Farms in Belmont.
London developer Shmuel Farhi threw in $600 to take care of utilities in the campaign office.
On the expense side, the largest item was $4,800 in advertising.
Not certain whether that line item includes the three sets of robocalls or not because we can’t find them listed anywhere.
In the Jackson camp, $5,910 in income was recorded.
DEC 4 JACKSON 2013Key contributors were Richard and Dorothy Jackson at $750 each; Reith & Associates — Dan Reith — ($700); Doug Tarry Jr. ($400); Colborne Centre Holdings — Shmuel Farhi — ($500); Century 21 — Harold Kewley — ($350); and Gord Campbell ($250).
Although it is not a requirement to include expense receipts, it should be noted Barwick was the only mayoral candidate to submit a complete accounting of his expenditures.
We’ve already noted the eight aldermanic candidates who filed statements at the end of January and we’ll recap that.
Maximum expenditure limit for aldermanic candidates was $28,355.45.
First-time councillor Mark Tinlin spent a little more than $7,700 on his city hall bid, with contributions from two developers — Shmuel Farhi, through Farhi Holdings in London, contributed $400 and Bob McCaig of St. Thomas supported Tinlin with $200.
Joan Rymal spent $4,500 on her successful campaign, with a $400 contribution from Farhi through Colborne Centre Holdings. She was also the beneficiary of $750 from Teare Software Solutions, Toronto and $300 from Reith & Associates in St. Thomas.
Jacqueline DeLeebeeck, who missed a seat on council by only 41 votes, spent $2,800 on her bid, with a $200 contribution from McCaig.
Mark Burgess eked out DeLeebeck for the final spot in the council chamber and spent a little more than $1,800 in the process.
John Allen and Brett Bear spent less than $1,000 each on their unsuccessful bids for election.
Frank Lattanzio and Phil Thomson ran expense-free campaigns.
We’ll examine the statements of the remaining aldermanic candidates next week.

NO GOLD STAR HERE

Coun. Mark Burgess

Coun. Mark Burgess

The attempt by Coun. Burgess at Monday’s deliberations to pare about $240,000 from the final tally by peering line-by-line into the 2015 operating budgets of several city departments was not wasted on Kohler, who praised the rookie member for doing his homework.
Uh, hate to deflate that balloon, but if Burgess had really done his homework he would known the Ontario Works, water and sewer budgets are not supported through a property tax levy.
And likewise, he should have discovered the St. Thomas Police Services Board determines the annual operating budget and not Police Chief Darryl Pinnell.
Greater due diligence needed before attempting again to embarrass or discredit staff and department heads.

CATCH A RIDE
Last fall, the City of London extended an invitation to St. Thomas to participate in its Regional Rideshare program.
It’s a carpooling program in operation since 2007 and proving very popular. The online service facilitates ridesharing by identifying shared destinations and user-driven routes and presents the common routes to users, according to a report to council Tuesday by transportation technician Ross Patrick.
The expanded program is projected to launch in May and only requires a verbal confirmation from city council at this point.
Total cost to the city this year would be in the $3 – 4,000 range and in future years the estimated cost would be less than $3,400.
With the lack of public transit linking the two cities, this is a great initiative to remove some vehicles from the busy commute periods each day.

DIVIDEND DILEMMA
AscentEarlier this week, the London Hydro board announced it will pay the City of London a one-time dividend of $10 million over a two-year period.
We haven’t heard what’s in store for St. Thomas this year as Ascent — formerly St. Thomas Energy — has in the past paid a dividend of $500,000 some years.
Now mind you, other years they haven’t handed over a penny.
Do we get the sense the latter scenario is likely the case for 2015?

QUOTE OF THE WEEK
14 jt 03 clarkejpg
“The budget process is extremely frustrating. The revenue streams just aren’t there for municipalities.”
Coun. Gary Clarke during final 2015 budget deliberations this week.
City Scope appears Saturday in the Times-Journal. Questions and comments may be emailed to ian.mccallum@sunmedia.ca.

Advertisements

One thought on “Spending big doesn’t get you the chain of office

  1. I would be more interested in a report on the details with Ascent than with a detailed breakdown of expense reports by candidates in an election campaign 6 months ago. As a taxpayer, how the City is managing it’s assets and subsidiaries is of much more interest than slamming an unsuccessful candidate for mayor.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s