Beware of guys with carnations in their lapels


city_scope_logo-cmyk
A municipal election campaign that had all the excitement of watching paint dry exploded into life Tuesday with Cliff Barwick’s announcement he is seeking a return to the mayor’s office at city hall.
That pits the two primary combatants in the 2010 mayoral showdown — Mayor Heather Jackson and Barwick — in a rematch on Oct. 27.
But, it is going to get better.
Over the next week or so, expect either Ald. Jeff Kohler or Ald. Mark Cosens to join the fray.
If it’s the former, that sets up a tantalizing scenario pitting the last three St. Thomas mayors in a winner-take-all smackdown.

And if you thought the 2006 and 2010 mayoral races were down and dirty, this will be anything goes — keeping in mind two current members of council will be left standing in the ultimate game of musical chairs.
This is high stakes, so why would Barwick go for the brass ring when he likely would be guaranteed a seat on council as an alderman?
BARWICK Cliff 08 cmyk
Is he out to exact revenge against Jackson for her 500-vote victory in the last election? A race that became known as the “anybody but Barwick” campaign.
Barwick is not hell bent on payback, at least not in the case of Jackson.
In a candid conversation with Barwick on Tuesday, he alluded to the possible impact of an outside influence on the mayor’s office.
“I am not mentioning any outside names, but the office of the mayor may attempted to be controlled or unduly influenced by outside source or sources,” he asserted. “And I believe you have to have a very strong individual in that office to combat that.”
We’ll take the liberty of connecting St. Thomas developer Bob McCaig to Barwick’s unnamed outside influence.
We prompted Barwick to further connect the dots.
“I’ve never seen a situation where in the last three mayoral elections, where there has been an attempt to put candidates forward who would be under the influence of outside sources.”
Introduce a whiff of party politics and the result is an unsavory environment in which to conduct city business, Barwick advises.
“You can see the little trace of party politics coming in and you can see that influence there. And the lobbying that goes on and it’s just not healthy.”
Keeping in mind the robocalls and lawsuit against Barwick, the city and staff and the St. Thomas Police Service that besmirched the 2010 campaign, is he ready for more of the same?
“It was dirty politics, I didn’t participate and I won’t participate in that. I will not lower myself to robocalls, I will leave that to some in the opposition.
“That was one of probably the most dirty campaigns ever conducted. What does that tell you about the character of the people involved?”
One of whom now sits on council and may very well join the mayoral race.
The other possibility? Someone may now reconsider.
“Maybe there were other people who were considering running who, with my name there, may not run.”

$30 MILLION, DREAM ON

As revealed at the police building committee meeting on Wednesday, the Class C cost estimates to build a new police building and to renovate the Colin McGregor Justice Building to meet all building and accessibility codes are virtually identical.
To recap, construction of a new facility on city-owned land adjacent to the Timken Centre would be $10.6 million, which would include a full basement.
21 jt 03 policejpg
The price tag would drop to $8.8 million with the finished basement reduced to 7,000 sq. ft from 23,000 sq. ft. in the first option.
Renovating the existing station would cost $10.2 million, if done in a phased-in manner. A “nightmare” according to Paul Harris of SPH Engineering due to unanticipated hurdles which could bump the final cost up by 20 to 30%.
If renovations to the existing building were not done in stages, the cost would drop to $9.1 million, but that doesn’t factor in relocation expenses during the undertaking.
So what is next?
Council will receive a summary of the two estimates in time for the lone August meeting on Monday. Some time before the end of the month, there will be a public information session where ratepayers can view the estimate material and ask questions.
It is anticipated council will then vote on which option to pursue when the regular meeting schedule resumes on Sept. 2.
So much for the shameless fearmongering on display in the McCaig and Cosens videos, where the price tag quoted had reached $30 million.
Talk about truth in advertising.

SHOUT OUT THE NEXT STOP A LITTLE LOUDER, PLEASE
With aldermen Kohler and Cosens having spent much of the summer challenging the need for
Ald. Mark CosensFile photo accessibility upgrades in conjunction with any renovations needed at the current police HQ, how are they going to react during Monday’s council meeting when they receive a report calling for an expenditure of $100,000 for an automated stop announcement system on the city’s transit buses.
Under the Ontarians with Disabilities Act, all conventional transit buses in the province must be equipped with automated call out and display of bus stops by Jan. 1, 2017.
JEFF KOHLER HS
In total, eight city transit buses are to be equipped with a system supplied by NextBus Inc., if approved by council.
Currently the drivers call out the stops, which meets with the regulations now in place.
Are the two members of the McCaig posse going to argue that method of announcement is sufficient and damn the rules?
That was the gist of their resistance to meeting accessibility codes in the Colin McGregor Justice Building.

QUOTE OF THE WEEK
“Frankly, they’d hire guys with carnations in their lapels to run me off the road.”
Ald. Cliff Barwick maintains his sense of humour when describing possible tactics considered by his naysayers bent on keeping him from returning to the mayor’s office.
City Scope appears Saturday in the Times-Journal. Questions and comments may be emailed to ian.mccallum@sunmedia.ca.

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “Beware of guys with carnations in their lapels

  1. WHO’S YOUR DADDY?
    With the power of the pen, you have transformed yourself into Barwick’s ‘undeclared campaign manager’. Will you be taking a leave of absence from the Times-Journal to officially take on that role?
    Barwick’s run for mayor may excite you but it will no doubt be about as welcome as a wet fart in church to most residents.
    For the good of the city, I hope that Mark Cosens does run for mayor and despite efforts by the other candidates and their campaign teams to besmirch him, I think he would get more votes than Jackson and Barwick combined.

    On a separate note, if you really believe that the total cost to build a new police station is $10.6 million, don’t bogart that joint, pass it around.

    • As to price tag of a new police station, nobody has said final construction cost will be $10.6 million. That is Class C estimate, still have to receive B and A estimates. Likewise for renovation estimates. But then again, there are those out there who will continue to fearmonger about the ultimate cost of a new facility, should council go with that option.

  2. So it is not shamelessly misleading to state “construction of a new facility on city-owned land adjacent to the Timken Centre would be $10.6 million, which would include a full basement”.

    The last published estimate I saw was $19.7 million. Perhaps if you had added that the $10.6 million was an estimate based on approximately 33% of the design development stage of the police station it would have been more truthful reporting.

  3. Nothing misleading with the figure. Previous stories have outlined what a Class C estimate is and don’t forget Class C estimate also applies to renovations to Colin McGregor Justice Building. Nowhere have we ever published a $19.7 million dollar figure. That’s a figment of someone’s imagination. As I said the fearmongering continues.

  4. The $19.7 million dollar figure was published by the City of St. Thomas at their council meeting on March 10th, 2014. On an apples-to-apples comparison before applying a development charge recovery of 10%, the costs identified were;
    Cost of new police station – $19,706,000
    Cost of renovation to existing – $14,089,000
    Difference = $5,677,000

  5. Was not even a Class C estimate and it was for a 40,000 sq. ft. facility. Even the police chief said this was far more space than needed so new proposal is for a 30,000 sq. ft. building. Nor does the renovation estimate include cost of leasing space during the project. Let’s include those details when quoting $19 million figure – a number that is no longer relevant in any case. What was released last week was an apples-to-apples comparison on a Class C estimate. All parties involved have made it clear these are construction/renovation costs not final project costs. And as we saw with the health unit, it ultimately came in under the $10 million budget. Again a case of running fast and loose with numbers.

  6. First the $19.7 million was “a figment of someone’s imagination”, now you say it is “a number that is no longer relevant in any case”.
    All I said was that the $19.7 million was the last number I saw published for the cost of a new police station. I don’t run fast and loose with numbers. If there has been a more recent full cost estimate, let’s hear it.
    We can debate the value and accuracy of Class C estimates till the cows come home. I personally think they offer little to no value, they are highly inaccurate and they slow down the process. Only when the project is fully defined and documented and goes to tender, will there be a number you might be able to hang your hat on.

    • Mr Sandison, the fact that you think a man who for all intents and purposes stole $40,000 from the people of St. Thomas should even be on council, let alone run for mayor, shows the quality of your values.

      No wonder even the PC/CPC associations in this riding disowned you. The only person who bothers with you is McCaig, and only because you’re just another of his lapdogs/mouthpieces.

  7. It’s is too bad that Cosens isn’t running for mayor… it would be nice to get rid of that useless drunk (just check Legends before a council meeting).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s