Ascent 2015 financial statement will spark your interest

city_scope_logo-cmykIt’s a much anticipated document and it can be found in the agenda for Monday night’s city council meeting.

We are referring to the city’s consolidated financial statements for 2015 which include details of its investment in Ascent Group Inc.

Not sure whether it is meant to offer reassurance to ratepayers, however that portion of the document opens with “The city owns 100% of Ascent Group Inc. which in turn owns 100% of St. Thomas Energy Inc., Ascent Energy Services Inc., Ascent Solutions Inc., Ascent Utility Services Inc., and Ascent Renewables.

Once you digest the Ascent Group financial statement we, as ratepayers, would be better off owning a fleet of wheezing Russian Ladas.

If you thought the 2014 Ascent picture was grim, hold on.

Its total assets at the end of 2015 are just shy of $53 million. That’s down from almost $67 million in 2014.

On the plus side, total liabilities are down to $52.2 million versus $66.8 million the year previous.

Do the math and the net assets ring in at $623,000. A paltry sum when you’re seeking a merger partner.stthomasenergyjpg

We’re just beginning.

Revenues for 2015 were $59.2 million ($99.6 million in 2014) and this is before Ascent began jettisoning excess baggage in earnest this year.

Again, on the positive side, operating expenses plunged, $65 million versus $106 million year-to-year.

Go back to the calculators again and that translates to a $6.2 million loss in operations for 2015. Don’t forget Ascent also had a $6.9 million loss in 2014.

That’s a lot of red ink for the owners, that would be the City of St. Thomas and ultimately ratepayers.

As unsettling as that may be, here is where alarms go off.

The city contracts Ascent to provide billing and collection services for water and sewer user charges. For that, the city paid Ascent $318,000 in 2015. About a 10 per cent hike over the contracted fee in 2014.

But is Ascent turning over the money collected for that contracted service?

It appears not if the city is owed $8.3 million from Ascent Group at the end of 2015.

Is this water and sewer money the only thing that’s keeping Ascent Group afloat?

Remember we went through this in 2014 when Ascent owed the city $7.9 million from this collection service.

Exactly one year ago we asked city treasurer David Aristone about this outstanding amount and wasn’t it supposed to be turned over to the finance department.

It’s supposed to be,” said Aristone at the time. “They (Ascent) may have had a cash flow issue that they couldn’t pay it to us.”

Seems like that ailment still lingers.

We called Aristone on Friday for clarification but did not hear back from him.

We would also like a clear answer to the question: As 100 per cent owners of Ascent, what is the total debt owing the city?

We previously speculated $20 million. Could it be as high as $30 million?

Ascent has been pared back to the bone this year, exactly where and how does the debt recovery begin?

Related posts:

Will tire-kickers appreciate the new, pared-back Ascent model?

Imposed salary cap, hey we can dance around that

Who is in the driver’s seat for St. Thomas Energy merger plan?

Interpreting Ascent deal through our ‘filters’

Sutherland stalling hits ratepayers in the pocket

Ascent sale is finalized, and now ratepayers are waiting for financial disclosure

More comfort needed at Pinafore Park comfort station?

Is Ascent realignment sign of a turnaround at the St. Thomas utility?

A duty upheld on the rarest of occasions

Council waffles on future of cemetery

Over-extended reach ultimately hobbled Ascent

Ascent CEO pulls the plug: resigns as of Sept. 30

From bad to worse over at Ascent

Ascent financial picture a shocker

A return to core business or fire sale at Ascent?


This week’s column is dedicated to the city’s human resources manager Graham Dart, who encourages staff to read City Scope. Or at least we think that’s what he meant.


You have to hand it to Lesley Buchanan, manager of St. Thomas Cemetery Company.

The last couple of years, the cemetery board has had to grovel to get a grant of just over $50,000 to help maintain and operate West Avenue and south Park cemeteries.


St. Thomas Cemetery Company manager Lesley Buchanan at West Ave. Cemetery.

To ease the financial burden, Buchanan is organizing a Run 4 Your Life Family Fun Run, not only as a fundraiser but to draw attention to the tribulations facing the St. Thomas Cemetery Company.

“We had to look at something where we could raise money. We need donations – and we need awareness,” Buchanan told People columnist Eric Bunnell recently.”

Is there not a hint of indignity in having to resort to this undertaking given the legions of city builders, entrepreneurs and municipal officials who rest there?

Reader Dave Mathers thinks so.

“Pretty sad when the city makes the cemetery have a fund-raising event,” writes Dave in an email.

Of course it is a call for action from Buchanan and the event deserves support.

Find out more at or at the main West Avenue office.

Related Posts:

Council waffles on future of cemetery

Long-term financial solution remains elusive

Cemetery stalemate continues

Is there a will for ‘amicable’ solution to cemetery crisis?

St. Thomas Cemetery Company: Who needs to reach out to who?


Was the appointment of Nancy Whitmore to the position of president and CEO at St. Thomas Elgin General Hospital a unanimous decision made by the succession planning committee, formed in May of 2015 to seek a replacement for outgoing CEO Paul Collins?

And was the board of governors unanimous in endorsing Whitmore’s promotion?Dr. Nancy Whitmore

The reason we ask is prompted by a letter sent our way that indicates the new CEO may not necessarily be the most popular kid on the block.

Not that the process of succession planning is necessarily a popularity contest.

However this quote accompanying the letter plants a seed of doubt.

“A bad manager can take a good staff and destroy it, causing the best employees to flee and the remainder to lose all motivation.”

Words of wisdom that likewise ring true in the corridors of city hall.

Related posts:

Will tire-kickers appreciate the new, pared-back Ascent model?

Imposed salary cap, hey we can dance around that

St. Thomas Elgin General Hospital board of governors: a bastion of integrity, honesty and transparency

Why is STEGH shielding board of governors chairperson Melanie Taylor?Blog Posts

Latest STEGH cuts no example of patient-centred care

St. Thomas Elgin General Hospital CEO bowing out on a high note

Job cuts revive that old two-step episode

Closing the hospital labs? We’ll notify you about that later

Time for more pruning over at the hospital

I’m sorry your patient care has been out-sourced

Just how thorough was the background check?

Hospital junkets open up wider health care debate

Accountability and transparency when mandated

Paul Collins signs five-year deal with hospital

And you thought the CEO of St. Thomas Elgin General Hospital had actually retired



“I believe business has a higher calling and we’re not just here to make a profit. Certainly we do and we’re very proud of it. Profit is not a dirty word. Profit means we’re here for another year make a profit and to support the community we’re in.”

Bryan White who, along with brother Jason, own and operate Steelway Building Systems near Aylmer. He was addressing several hundred people Thursday, September 15, 2016 at Steelway’s 40th anniversary open house.

City Scope appears Saturday in the St. Thomas Times-Journal. Questions and comments may be emailed to


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s